Welcome:
Scenario: Manager didn’t seem to be listening to subordinate.
CC:
Best way to solve technical issues.
Good paths for adult children
How CC went bad:
Name calling
Better way:
Prepare thoughts and emotions
What to address: Content, Pattern, Relationship
What is the topic that I need to discuss?
How can I bring it up in a way that strengthens that relationship?
Our stories provoke their own confirming data.
Change story to change emotions.
6 things didn’t work well:
Interrupt
Urgent
Invade space
Vague “unexceptable”
Didn’t point out specific expense policies that weren’t followed
Comment how many poppers eaten
Victim: What’s my role? What should I do?
Villain: Why would a reasonable, rational, decent person do this?
Helpless: What should I do right now to move toward what I really want?
Practice: Think about why other person wants to think of alternatives
Start with heart: What is our purpose
Motives often degrade when conversations turn crucial.
When getting upset, stop and think about what your real goals are. For me, the other person, the relationship, the organization
State path: Facts, Story, Ask for their path (what is your perspective?)
Meeting Multitasker: I noticed you on your phone much of the time during the meeting. It appeared that you weren’t following the conversation. I want you to know that you can speak up if there is something urgent you need to deal with and we can determine a better time to have the conversation. Is there any way we can help so you can take care of priorities and then have the attention available to provide your insight?
Sample answer asked “Could you help me understand what was going on?” Could that be viewed as intrusive?
Correct answer for question #3 on https://training.vitalsmarts.com/learn/course/dialogue/state-my-path/the-skill?client=sps-commerce-inc&page=4 appears to accuse them of being more “worried about looking good with leadership then sticking with what we agreed to” and D didn’t have an accusation.
Correct answer for question #4 appears to accuse: “I am wondering if you have concerns about our focus on increasing diversity or if you have concerns about some of the other candidates in the pool.”
Focus: How can I convey my meaning? -> How can all meaning be added to the conversation? (Share meaning and get others to share their meaning)
Learn to look:
Silence
verbal violence: labeling, coercion
Seek Mutual Purpose:
Agree to agree (out loud)
Ask Why to get purpose: (Any why is that important)
Find the “And”: Shared goal/purpose
Examples:
Pro-life vs. pro-choice: Started by taking about life experiences that led to their positions. Mutual purpose: No woman feels like she needs to consider abortion
Racism: Started by learning about them which lead to them learning about him.
When safety is at risk, step out of the conversation and re-establish safety and purpose
Listening: Ability to listen determined by motive, Seeing listening builds relationships, Seek the truth in what others say and listen to understand
Ask, mirror, paraphrase, and prime
Respond with: Agree, Build, Compare (Can I share my different experience?)
Plan how to end the conversation. Who will do what by when? Summarize and then ask for next steps
Start with one skill: State path
Wednesday, April 23, 2025
Crucial Conversations Notes
Saturday, July 17, 2021
Boundries can give Freedom
Boundaries that limit what you can do can actually give you more freedom. Going past those boundaries can actually limit your future freedom.
A fence on the edge of a cliff gives you the freedom to safely go up to that fence. Going past that boundary can cause injuries that prevent you from walking around anymore.
A barrier on the side of a race track makes it safer to driver faster on the track. Going past those boundaries can prevent you from ever racing again.
The Devil will tell you that the boundaries limit your freedom but he will mock you once your freedom is really limited by the damage done by going past those boundaries.
Plan for Problems
Before taking off in a glider, we always review our emergency plan --
we plan for problems. In normal life it also makes a lot of sense to
plan for how you will handle problems or they will trip and trap you.
There are different patterns for how to handle problems so make sure you choose the correct pattern.
Go straight ahead:
Sometimes you need to just keep going straight ahead. When Moses struck the rock for water the 2nd time, he still led the people until the end of his shortened time of service. A rope break in a
glider under 200 ft should be handled by landing straight ahead.
Turn around and go back:
Sometimes you need to turn around and go back. I Corinthians 10:14
tells us to "Flee idolatry." A rope break in a glider from 200-500 ft
should usually be handled by turning quickly back and landing the
opposite way on the runway.
Change your path: Sometimes you need to change your path. Peter said he would accompany Jesus even unto death but then denied him. He later found the better way to serve in humility instead of pride. A rope break in a glider from 500-800 ft will sometimes be handled by turning and landing on a cross-wind runway.
Just keep going: Sometimes you need to just continue with your normal path. In Acts 4:19-20 Peter and John said "Whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto God, judge ye. For we cannot but speak the things which we have seen and heard." A rope break in a glider from above 800 ft will usually be handled by doing a normal pattern landing.
The right plan may still be hard and bumpy.
Plan for temptation, hurt, bullying, God's prompting, parents' requests, work to do, etc.
Friday, July 24, 2020
Price Controls Mean Shortages, Even during Pandemics
"if Retailer A wants to charge eighty dollars for hand sanitizer, this creates an opportunity for competitors to charge less. In this case, the retailer does not suffer from government-imposed fines, but from consumers who abandon it to purchase from lower-priced ones. Manufacturers will redirect production to the most profitable and in-demand products, in this case hand sanitizer."
Wednesday, May 20, 2020
Outliers
Chapter 1: Mathew effect
25: selection, streaming, and differentiated experience.
Most selected didn't succeed.
33: why don't adjust for age? Because individual success. Really?!?
Chapter 2: 10,000 hour rule
39: no greats practiced less than other greats. No mediocre practiced more than other mediocre.
Should master level be a goal?
Chapter 3: The Trouble with Geniuses, Part 1
86: How far past “good enough” doesn’t affect outcome. Does it affect anything (e.g. study time, number of expertise areas, expectations, stress, etc)?
Having few people like you means less connection with people.
convergence vs. divergence tests
Chapter 4: The Trouble with Geniuses, Part 2
104: poor intimidated by authority
concerned cultivation vs. accomplishment of natural growth (lax intellectually)
Entitlement vs. better behaved, less whiny, more creative with time, independent
105: middle class children adjusted interactions
Is our education of the poor fatally flawed?
Chapter 5: The Three Lessons of Joe Flom
How much of a factor are personal differences?
Chapter 6: Harlen Kentucky
A deeper understanding brings clarity. Is our understanding deep enough?
Chapter 7: The Ethnic Theory of Plane Crashes
184: multiple bad initial conditions plus 7 consecutive errors. Usually teamwork/communication
197: helper must speak up and clearly.
220: change cultural norms for pilots in their 50s.
221: don't avoid talking about group weaknesses.
Chapter 8: Rice Paddies and Math Tests
228: memorize 2 seconds so length of words affects number of digits.
Number names affect ease of math learning
237: if yield highly varies with care, you can't use slave labor. Use fixed rents. Hard work vs. fatalism
246: not ability -- attitude (persistence)
Chapter 9: Marita’s Bargain
More time schooling and don’t stop learning in the summer
Epilogue: A Jamaican Story
Saturday, October 13, 2018
Work Rules
Thursday, July 12, 2018
The Hard Thing about Hard Things
Thursday, December 07, 2017
Zombie Chess
Is this fun or interesting?
Friday, February 17, 2017
Rand Paul: “Use It Or Lose It” on Gov’t Spending Needs To Stop
http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/rand-paul-use-lose/
Friday, October 07, 2016
Journalists hit with $200 Wi-Fi bill for presidential debates - CNET
"It's not immediately clear what Hofstra's legal basis for this action is since the Federal Communications Commission issued an enforcement advisory last year that said blocking an individual's personal Wi-Fi hotspot is illegal."