Tuesday, October 13, 2009
No More Troops for Afghanistan | Malou Innocent | Cato Institute: Commentary
No More Troops for Afghanistan | Malou Innocent | Cato Institute: Commentary: "A long-term, large-scale presence is not necessary to disrupt al Qaeda, and going after the group does not require Washington to pacify the entire country. Denying a sanctuary to terrorists that seek to attack the U.S. can be done through aerial surveillance, retaining covert operatives for discrete operations against specific targets, and ongoing intelligence-sharing with countries in the region. Overall, remaining in Afghanistan is more likely to tarnish America's reputation and undermine U.S. security than would withdrawal."
Nobel Panel Defends Obama Peace Prize Decision - Political News - FOXNews.com
Nobel Panel Defends Obama Peace Prize Decision - Political News - FOXNews.com: "Jagland singled out Obama's efforts to heal the divide between the West and the Muslim world and scale down a Bush-era proposal for an anti-missile shield in Europe.
'All these things have contributed to -- I wouldn't say a safer world -- but a world with less tension,'"
"The left-leaning committee whose members are appointed by the Norwegian Parliament lauded the change in global mood wrought by Obama's calls for peace and cooperation, and praised his pledges to reduce the world stock of nuclear arms, ease U.S. conflicts with Muslim nations and strengthen the country's role in combating climate change."
'All these things have contributed to -- I wouldn't say a safer world -- but a world with less tension,'"
"The left-leaning committee whose members are appointed by the Norwegian Parliament lauded the change in global mood wrought by Obama's calls for peace and cooperation, and praised his pledges to reduce the world stock of nuclear arms, ease U.S. conflicts with Muslim nations and strengthen the country's role in combating climate change."
Tracking Your Taxes: Is Essential Air Service Really Essential? - Political News - FOXNews.com
Tracking Your Taxes: Is Essential Air Service Really Essential? - Political News - FOXNews.com: "Critics say the program is out of control. Subsidies were supposed to be no higher than $200 per ticket for cities less than 210 miles from a sizable airport, but in practice, the limit is not enforced.
Consider these ticket prices and taxpayer subsidies:
-- Cape Girardeau, Mo., to St. Louis: ticket price $189, taxpayer subsidy $1,939.
-- Glendive Mont., to Billings: ticket price $233, taxpayer subsidy $2,526.
-- Alamogordo, N.M., to Albuquerque: ticket price $192, taxpayer subsidy $2,270
-- Harve, Mont., to Billings: ticket price $233, �taxpayer subsidy, $2887
-- Ely, Nev., to Denver: ticket price $300, taxpayer subsidy $4,504.
The program serves roughly 3,000 people per day -- �mostly businessmen, who critics argue can and should pay more for their flight. Instead, Congress continues to increase the taxpayers' portion of the ticket."
Consider these ticket prices and taxpayer subsidies:
-- Cape Girardeau, Mo., to St. Louis: ticket price $189, taxpayer subsidy $1,939.
-- Glendive Mont., to Billings: ticket price $233, taxpayer subsidy $2,526.
-- Alamogordo, N.M., to Albuquerque: ticket price $192, taxpayer subsidy $2,270
-- Harve, Mont., to Billings: ticket price $233, �taxpayer subsidy, $2887
-- Ely, Nev., to Denver: ticket price $300, taxpayer subsidy $4,504.
The program serves roughly 3,000 people per day -- �mostly businessmen, who critics argue can and should pay more for their flight. Instead, Congress continues to increase the taxpayers' portion of the ticket."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)