Campaign For Liberty — Waterboy: "David Axelrod argued the lie again today when he said we can't afford to spend our money on a tax cut for the rich when there are more important things to spend it on. Where to begin....a) leaving rates alone is not a cut, b) keeping your money is not spending, and c) it is not our money, it belongs to whoever earned it. But these are the liberal talking points, repeated over and over and over again, as if the quantity of repetition might improve the quality of the argument. It won't.
The no-tax-increase-is-spending argument is absurd on its face. If not raising taxes is the same as spending, then is electing not to steal money from a church the same as making a contribution? Do you think the IRS will let me deduct all the money I was going to steal from charities but then decided to let them keep?"
Thursday, December 02, 2010
More Gridlock, Please | Michael D. Tanner | Cato Institute: Commentary
More Gridlock, Please | Michael D. Tanner | Cato Institute: Commentary: "We know from history that during periods of divided government, which tends to lead to gridlock, government spending increases by an average of less than 2% annually. In contrast, under unified government with cooperation rather than gridlock, spending grows by an average of more than 5%."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)