Drugs and Conservatives Should Go Together | Jeffrey A. Miron | Cato Institute: Commentary

Drugs and Conservatives Should Go Together | Jeffrey A. Miron | Cato Institute: Commentary: "Drug prohibition is hard to reconcile with constitutionally limited government. The Constitution gives the federal government a few expressly enumerated powers, with all others reserved to the states (or to the people) under the 10th Amendment. None of the enumerated powers authorizes Congress to outlaw specific products, only to regulate interstate commerce. Thus, laws regulating interstate trade in drugs might pass constitutional muster, but outright bans cannot. Indeed, when the United States wanted to outlaw alcohol, it passed the 18th Amendment. The country has never adopted such constitutional authorization for drug prohibition."

"Yes, drugs can harm innocent third parties, but so can — and do — alcohol, cars and many other legal products. Consistency demands treating drugs like these other goods, which means keeping them legal while punishing irresponsible use, such as driving under the influence.

Legalization would take drug control out government's incompetent hands and place it with churches, medical professionals, coaches, friends and families. These are precisely the private institutions whose virtues conservatives extol in other areas."

Five noteworthy aspects of Britain's tough spending plan - Policing, prisons - CSMonitor.com

Five noteworthy aspects of Britain's tough spending plan - Policing, prisons - CSMonitor.com: "The Home Office, which handles policing, will swallow a 6 percent cut each year for the next four years"

Compounded, that is a 22% cut!