Negative rights vs. Positive rights | Cranach: The Blog of Veith

Negative rights vs. Positive rights | Cranach: The Blog of Veith: "The problem is that elevating benefits to the level of rights confers an unlimited grant of power to the government. In the legislative process, laudable sentiments too often emerge as programs with unconstrained costs — or, in the case of the personal mandate in Obamacare, policies that rely on coercion. . . .
From government’s point of view, positive rights are marching orders. Heaven and earth must be moved to deliver the promises. The state grows rapidly and ultimately it outruns the capacity of the tax base to pay for it all, endangering the financial security of everyone.

Thirty years ago, Portugal’s government cost its taxpayers about 20 percent of GDP. Then a new constitution was written, chock full of positive rights — the right to housing, education, health, social security. The size of government doubled. Portugal’s borrowing costs, like that of Greece and Ireland, have ballooned."

Obama cites Steve Jobs' wealth, product success | Nanotech - The Circuits Blog - CNET News

Obama cites Steve Jobs' wealth, product success | Nanotech - The Circuits Blog - CNET News: Obama said "We expect that person to be rich, and that's a good thing. We want that incentive. That's part of the free market,"

That doesn't seem to match with his comment that “I do think at a certain point you’ve made enough money”