Climate Scientists Subverted Peer Review | Patrick J. Michaels | Cato Institute: Commentary: "paint a picture of IPCC boffins committing science's capital crime: Trying to game the peer-reviewed literature, which is akin to editing what goes in the Bible."
So that isn't "scientific" and anything based on it must be reviewed to determine if it can stand without that support.
"The last IPCC compendium on climate science, published in 2007, left out plenty of peer-reviewed science that it found inconveniently disagreeable."
No comments:
Post a Comment