Walmart and Discrimination - Robert P. Murphy - Mises Daily: "Most Americans don't have a particular preference for having a man versus a woman ring up their groceries at Walmart, and so they take claims of sexual discrimination seriously. But Americans on net do have a preference to be greeted at the door of a restaurant by a young, pretty woman, and that's why restaurants cater to that preference. This also explains why movie producers are willing to pay millions of dollars to gorgeous stars, even though less attractive thespians could give 'the same' performance for much less money."
"If analyzed, the reason for this different intuition would boil down to the fact that hiring pretty women as hostesses actually is a 'business decision' catering to customer preferences, whereas hiring pretty women as midlevel executive assistants is a 'personal decision' catering to the manager's preferences. The first practice makes the company more money, while the second squanders it."
"the free market automatically punishes 'bad' discrimination. Unlike under government laws, here there is no chance of a guilty party escaping his or her punishment — and the punishment itself is exactly proportional to the severity of the 'offense.'"
"f it really were true that hundreds of thousands of women were being systematically underpaid by Walmart, then Target and other stores could reap an enormous advantage by offering slight pay raises and inducing them all to quit."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment