Thursday, September 13, 2012
California's Prop 37: A Feast for Lawyers | Walter Olson | Cato Institute: Commentary
California's Prop 37: A Feast for Lawyers | Walter Olson | Cato Institute: Commentary: "California's fabled Proposition 65, enacted in 1986, requires the labeling of products that expose consumers to substances linked to cancer. That's a pleasant-sounding idea too, but 26 years later the law has benefited almost no one but litigators. Even as cancer remains just as much of a problem in California as elsewhere, a cadre of lawyers in the state have made many, many tens of millions of dollars filing inadequate-labeling suits against purveyors of such products as candles, fireplace logs, Christmas lights, hammers, billiard cue chalk, matches, grilled chicken, life-saving drugs, brass doorknobs, car exhaust in parking garages, and on and on. (Most of the money in the resulting settlements goes to the lawyers, which is one reason defendants often describe Prop 65 litigation as legalized extortion.)"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment